To make sure we’re all on the same page, please read the following definitions.
Naturalism: the doctrine that the world can be understood in scientific terms without recourse to spiritual or supernatural explanations
Materialism: a desire for wealth and material possessions with little interest in ethical or spiritual matters.
Consumerism: A preoccupation with and an inclination toward the buying of consumer goods.
QUESTION: Based on the definition for Naturalism, does Materialism naturally follow? And does Consumerism then naturally follow Materialism?
A blogger seems to think so. He writes … if the physical world is all there is then we must get all of our fulfillment from material things in this life.
He further suggests … consumerism is one of the logical outcomes of materialism.
Background: This blogger is a pastor of a Christian church, which naturally follows that his outlook is different from many of us. Nevertheless, his perspective on this particular issue intrigued me and I decided to open it for discussion.
What do you think? Does one follow the other? If we reject spiritual or supernatural explanations about our world, will we then be entirely focused on the accumulation of wealth and material possessions? Will our entire focus on life be directed towards the buying of consumer goods?
P.S. Someone left the following comment related to this blogger’s post: It is indeed silly how much time, energy, and money we invest in things that are destined to disappear. I couldn’t help but think to myself … It is indeed silly how much time, energy, and money some people invest in things that don’t exist.