Do you remember how, at the beginning of all the election commotion, tRump threatened to run as an Independent if he didn’t get the Republican nomination? (The reason being he wasn’t being “treated fairly.”) Then, after basking in some of the media coverage he loves so well, he agreed to be a good little Republican and signed the “Loyalty Pledge.”
Of course there are obvious advantages to being supported by one of the major political parties as opposed to running as an Independent. A big one being all sorts of financial assistance. For example, once tRump officially became a “Republican,” he was backed by such dollar-worthy supporters as Peter Thiel, Carl Icahn, Tom Barrack, Woody Johnson, Stephen Feinberg, Steven Mnuchin, Sheldon Adelson, Robert Mercer, T. Boone Pickens, Stanley Hubbard, Darwin Deason, Wilbur Ross, Andrew Beal, and John Paulson. (Can you not agree that he’s going to be beholden to these fellows at various points in time after he takes office?)
But that isn’t the point of this post. Something crossed my mind today and I’ve been curious to know if anyone agrees with me.
After reading about and listening to (“60 Minutes”) our President-Elect (hate to even type those words), I’ve noticed how he’s been slightly altering some of the things he said he was going to do if elected. And many of the changes are in direct opposition to the Conservative POV. So I’ve been asking myself … could it be that the whole Independent vs. Republican hullabaloo was a sham? Could it be these were things he wanted to do from the very beginning? Could it be that he made this agreement more to pacify the party so he could move forward with legitimacy while all the time he had “The Trump Plan” in the back of his mind?
It’s become apparent his choice of cabinet members has disturbed many. Others are surely bothered by some of the policy statements and requests (security clearance for family members) he’s made since the election.
Can we help but wonder what else this Wild Card is planning?
I agree he is a wild card. But as to a clever plan behind it all, I am doubtful. I think the more obvious answer is that he really is a wild card.
I recall back to the campaign it was noted that on many issues it was hard to determine Trump’s position because he flip flopped so often. It seems to me that he is person with few ideological passions, rather his positions seem based on what is best him at that time, which seems to best explain why his positions change so frequently.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Peter, your outlook (“his positions seem based on what is best [for] him at that time”) is probably the more accurate one. Mine was just a thought that popped into my head and I was curious to see if it made sense to anyone else.
LikeLike
I just heard an interview with a person who wrote a biography on Trump. He made a couple of observations:
– good chance Trump won’t complete his term, he is not a person who tends to commit long term;
– Trump is less self assured than his bluster implies;
– A risk that Trump will be unduly influenced by the last person who talks to him;
– Trump is not ideological he has changed his stance on many issues over his life, and continues to do so.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Peter wrote: “– good chance Trump won’t complete his term, he is not a person who tends to commit long term;”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/11/prediction-professor-who-called-trumps-big-win-also-made-another-forecast-trump-will-be-impeached/
LikeLiked by 3 people
Which will mean, President Mike Pence and an even bigger movement toward a Christian theocratic government. Yeah, we’re f**ked no matter how ya look at it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yep, and women, children, the poor, and LGBT’s are especially f**ked. He and Ryan will be best buds.
LikeLiked by 2 people
😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
None of the above. He wanted revenge for Obama tearing him to shreds at the correspondants dinner.
It’s dark, but you can see the seed get planted
LikeLiked by 5 people
Ahhh yes. I remember that. Poor guy. *sob-sob*
I guess revenge is mightier than the sword, eh?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Was it Confucious who said, If you set off on a path of revenge, dig two graves.
LikeLiked by 4 people
That was Harpo Marx.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I doubt our boy has anything resembling a plan whatsoever. I do like that the Republican party isn’t doing back flips over tRump’s cabinet picks and so on. 4 years of Republicans ripping themselves apart will hurt my feelings not one bit.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I am worried that he will have no plan, no thought that could last more than a few hours, much less than a day or night. His ability to simply deny things he had clearly said, was on video saying and unashamed to deny worries me. He could make a horrible mistake, a military call and then after it went wrong say he never ordered it. Again these two men in those offices make me very worried. Hugs
LikeLiked by 2 people
Your point is well-made, Scottie. Hadn’t thought about the military angle, but you’re right — which makes him even MORE scary!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think in a lot of ways Trump is the wild card. He likes doing things his way (or the highway) and will no doubt only tolerate sycophants in his presence. So Trump is in charge of the “Fuck you I’ll do it my way party” If that’s not a political wild card I don’t know what would be.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s sorta’ the point I was trying to make, SD. You just worded it better. 🙂
LikeLike
Just saw this on Facebook (posted by Godless in Dixie from a Tweet):
John: *writes Revelations* Lord, the end is signaled by trumpets?
God: No, Trump/Pence.
John: Right. Trumpets.
God: Fine. They’ll know.
LikeLiked by 4 people
“I’ve noticed how he’s been slightly altering some of the things he said he was going to do if elected.”
Yes. Even his acceptance speech was much, much different than the rhetoric he threw around during the campaign.
Personally, I think all politicians say things they don’t mean during campaigns just to get elected. Trump included.
I do think he’s a wild card though. I don’t think he fits into the box of either party, and if you think about it, he’s really destroyed both parties. I think we will have to wait and see what he’ll do when he’s sworn in.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“I think we will have to wait and see what he’ll do when he’s sworn in.” My guess: lots of playing golf in Florida and Scotland and a great deal of grabbing young interns by the p***y.
LikeLiked by 2 people
yes, our Predator in Chief will be hard at work
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pay attention to some of the possible picks for tRump’s advisors, etc. Notice that Steven Mnuchin, Wilber Ross, and Tom Barrack are all included — each of them in the “dollar worthy” list I mentioned above in my post.
No surprisingly, tRump is following the politician’s creed: “You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours.” Oh but wait! Didn’t tRump run on the platform that he was NOT a politician? *rolling on the floor laughing*
A couple of other names that I saw on the list truly make me gag: Joe Arpaio (former highly bigoted Arizona sheriff), Mike Huckabee (former Arkansas governor and religious nut), and Sarah Palin (former beauty queen and totally wacko ex-governor of Alaska).
I know it’s already been agreed, but I have to say it one more time: the next four years are going to be insane!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Here is one for you!
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-18/pheasant-elect-bird-with-trumps-quiff-draws-crowds-in-china/8036178
LikeLiked by 3 people
😀 Definite resemblance!
LikeLike
Have you been reading about his proposed tax reform policy? Set aside that it will hit poorer single parents hard (which is reprehensible). Apparently he’s talking about getting rid of the per-child credit in favor of a larger (fixed) standard deduction. You know whom that part will hit hardest? Families with lots of kids… among whom are Fundagelicals, Catholics, and traditional rural farm families.
Apart from whether it’s a good policy or not… what struck me today (in terms of your observation that he’s changing his tune post-election): I can’t think of a nicer way to say “Thank y–” … uh, actually, I mean “Fvkk you” … to a big group of people that put him in office. We’re gonna make America great again, and regular working folk are going to improve economically… oh, except you guys.
P.S. Of course Trump’s “policies” are like the weather in Colorado… “Don’t like it? Wait 5 minutes.” So anything that comes out of his mouth really means nothing until it’s enacted. Still, the fact that he’d even say it is quite the misalignment from a big group of supporters that thought he had their back.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Indeed! If you dig around a bit and really examine his “plans,” you’ll find they are a long way from helping those who supported him. And the sad part? The people who waved their flags, flashed their campaign banners, put Trump/Pence signs in their yards, wore their little red baseball caps, and believed his Make America Great Again rhetoric — they are the ones who will never know what hit them until it’s too late.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I came across this quote in the comments section of Captain Cassidy’s blog over on Patheos. It was just too good not to share:
LikeLiked by 3 people
Oh that is priceless! Thanks for sharing ,
LikeLike
President-Elect’s Legal Team Wants Judge To Delay Trump University Case
http://www.npr.org/2016/11/18/502539446/president-elects-legal-team-wants-judge-to-delay-trump-university-case
“Hey, Donald… tell us again about how wrong it was that so-called ‘Crooked Hillary’ didn’t get prosecuted for allegedly breaking the law! Tell us again about how you’re going to Washington to fight the ‘rigged system’ that favors the elites! Because *you* would never use Presidential status to evade the rules that apply to every other citizen, would you?”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Of COURSE they want to delay the case! In fact, dollars to donuts, they’ll end up having it dismissed. Not sure how (I’m certainly not versed in the law), but I have little doubt those sneaky bastards will find a way.
Gawd! I hope I can live through the next four years without losing my mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read today that they are close to settling it for 25 Million dollars, Seems to be for each lawsuit but I am not sure. The tRump people are insisting that part of the deal be he admits no guilt. Keep up the good fight. Hugs
LikeLike
Scottie, do you have a link?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will look, seen it this morning somewhere but as all tRump news upsets me I don’t remember where. I will google search it. Hugs
LikeLike
here is one I found. Hugs
http://nypost.com/2016/11/18/trump-nears-settlement-in-trump-university-fraud-lawsuits/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sam Harris suggested that it provides an insight into Donald Trump’s personality that he apparently feels no shame over the scam that is Trump University.
Some years ago I was involved in reviewing business lending risks in a large Australian bank. I reviewed all the major lending losses from the recession of the early 1990’s. Two of the key lessons were:
– be very wary of property developers;
– be very wary of companies named after their major shareholder.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Just another example of the “Wild Card” who says one thing one day and changes it the next:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/17/trump-camp-denies-muslim-ban-registry
LikeLiked by 1 person
Two phrases I marked today in an article motivated me to share it with you. I hope you will also find the full text worth reading.
(Sorry I don’t know how to typeset italics or bold).
===Write a list of things you would never do. Because it is possible that in the next year, you will do them.
Write a list of things you would never believe. Because it is possible that in the next year, you will either believe them or be forced to say you believe them. ===
and:
—You may be wondering why I am writing a letter to Americans in a Dutch news outlet. It is because I do not trust the US outlets to remain free, and believe that many are already compromised. —
Please click on the following link:
https://thecorrespondent.com/5696/were-heading-into-dark-times-this-is-how-to-be-your-own-light-in-the-age-of-trump/1611114266432-e23ea1a6?utm_source=De+Correspondent+-+English+public+list&utm_campaign=c29cbedbff-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2016_11_18&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_7bb174c8f0-c29cbedbff-85201169
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nate has a very helpful formatting guide on his blog Here.
LikeLike
Thanks for the tip, Peter! I just read it, together with Nan’s reaction. But I have to bookmark the main text, because it is approximately 16 minutes 38 seconds over bedtime. Good night! 🙂 .-
LikeLike
Federico, thank you so much for sharing this article. It is a very sobering look at our future but few can deny that what she writes is much too close to fact. I’ve been trying to stay hopeful that things won’t be as bad as many have predicted but each passing day is undermining that hope.
I fear that many are going to discover that all is not as it seems and pain and disappointment is but a breath away.
LikeLike
This essay, and another fascinating one of a Dutch journalist of that source, convince me that unfortunately they don’t exaggerate. The title of that article is “Waking up in a New World Order”; it marks the November 8 outcome “not only an electoral earthquake, but also a geopolitical one”.
Nan, until now I have been trying, hard, to support your optimism, but I’m afraid I cannot sustain it. – A good reason to keep following your blog!!
LikeLike
How many items on this list would you agree with?
I’m OK with item 1, not sure about the rest:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/eidos/2016/11/10-nice-things-about-donald-j-trump/
LikeLike
I’m with you on #1. The only other is #4 (I actually think this may be a good thing.)
The problem with this list is it’s put together by a believer, so he is happy with: the possible ending of (evil) legalized abortion, the option of getting a conservative Supreme Court judge, Mike Pence as the VP-Elect, Mike Pompeo (a Hawk) as Director of CIA, and the bonus item … “allowing religious freedom for religious educational institutions.”
This guy may be gleeful now, but the way tRump has and continues to shift gears related to his “campaign promises,” his attitude may change.
Re: #8? I’ll believe that when it happens. Especially if he’s forced to put his regular business into a blind trust.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He will give up the presidency before ever putting his assets in a blind trust. That would mean selling everything he owns and putting that money into a trust run by others. He can not and will not do that. for several reasons, his assets are not as large as he pretends, his connection to less than reputable organisations here and overseas, and his own ego. Simply put his brand and his assets go down if he can’t parley this presidency into more profit. As he is profit driven he won’t do it. Hugs
LikeLiked by 2 people
You summed it up well, Scottie. The bottom line is he’s no different than the 1%. In fact, he may actually be a little greedier than most of them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And I dare say more desperate than those others. He pretends so hard to be what he is not he has convinced himself of it. Hugs
LikeLiked by 1 person
Trump’s Taiwanese phone call is likely a portend of things to come.
What odd’s Trump never even considered the diplomatic consequneces? My guess is that the Taiwanese initiated the call and Trump could not resist talking to some folk who were going to tell him how glad they were that he won.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Totally agree, Peter. He continues to prove on a pretty much daily basis his “wild card” status.
My understanding is several leaders of various countries have called him but he hasn’t spoken to all of them. The fact he chose to talk to the Taiwan leader considering all the ramifications is just another example of his ignorance of foreign affairs.
Some have speculated the reason he’s doing these “thank you” rallies is because he needs/thrives on the adulation of crowds. How in the world is he ever going to make it through a full week — yea, even a DAY — in the Oval Office?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Pakistanis released a transcript of the phone call with their leader, which seemed to consist of Donald Trump saying what a great fellow Nawaz Sharif was.
LikeLike
Trump thought he was talking to Omar Sharif, however.
LikeLike
No doubt he thought he could be a Middle East advisor with his knowledge of Arabia:
LikeLiked by 3 people
I was interested in a story where Mark Wahlberg recalls an earlier discussion he had with Donald Trump:
LikeLiked by 3 people
I see that Trump has now claimed that his unpredictability is a strength – I suppose it as the old saying goes:
“keep them guessing”
LikeLiked by 1 person
I heard a Trump advisor say that the problem with Trump’s critics is that they take what he says seriously. The implication was that Trump doesn’t really mean a lot of what he says.
I do fear that unless Trump closes his Twitter account he will run the risk of doing real damage to international relations, it seems fairly clear that his tweets are like thought bubbles rather than carefully reasoned positions. This starts to become a potential problem when dealing with other countries like China where face and honour is a critical part of the culture.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Absolutely, Peter! Not only that, there are certain phrases and idioms used by Americans that would/could be an insult to someone in another country.
There’s no doubt, he’s a walking time bomb. And IMO, that “Trump advisor” is talking out of his you-know-what. He’s just trying to cover up/excuse his boss’s complete idiocy!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apparently Trump operates on little sleep, around 4 hours per night, and is prone to send off Tweets in the wee small hours.
The State Department will need to establish a special Tweet response team to smooth over Trumps thought bubbles going forward.
I think I will need to dust off my copies of West Wing and imagine an alternative President:
LikeLiked by 1 person
Can you imagine? A “Tweet Response Team” situated within the halls of the White House. Who woulda’ thought?
LikeLike